A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN EXTROVERT AND INTROVERT PERSONALITY OF STUDENTS SPEAKING PERFORMANCE OF UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH BULUKUMBA

Authors

  • Agus Kirana Isma Universitas Muhammadiyah Bulukumba
  • Fahmi Room Universitas Muhammadiyah Bulukumba
  • Nur Ina Syam Universitas Muhammadiyah Bulukumba

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56959/jpss.v8i1.71

Keywords:

Comparative Study Extrovert, introvert, Speaking Performance

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to find out the significant difference on speaking performance between extrovert and introvert students at the sixth semester English Department of Universitas Muhammadiyah Bulukumba. The population of this study is one class in sixth semester consisting 26 students at English Department of Universitas Muhammadiyah Bulukumba. And the sample of this research were consist 5 students extrovert and 5 students introvert in 19.A class This research used quantitative approach and the type of this research was a causalcomparative. In collecting the data, the researcher distributed the questionnaire to the respondents in order to determine extrovert and introvert students, which consisted of 30 questions developed from indicators of extrovert and introvert and the questions adopted from Eysenck Personality Inventory. Then, the researcher used oral test to know students speaking performance. The researcher used analysis statistically to analyze the mean score. Then, the result of analysis statistically found that, the mean score of extrovert student is 8,2. And the mean score of introvert students is 4,8. it means that there is a significant difference on students speaking performance between extrovert and introvert students. The result showed that extrovert students outperformed than introvert students in speaking performance. Based on the finding above, it is concluded that speaking performance of extrovert students better than speaking performance of introvert students, in the sixth semseter of English Department of Universitas Muhammadiyah Bulukumba

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brown, H. D. (1994). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach To Language Pedagogy. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents.

Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of Language Learning & Teaching 4th Edition. New York : Pearson Education.166

Brown, H. D. (2004). Assessing Speaking Language assessment Principle and classroomm practice. San Fransisco: Pearson education, Inc.

Brown, H. D. (2019). Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices. london : logman.

Brown, H. D. (2003). Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices. London: logman. 3

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th Edition). New Jersey : Pearson Education,inc.142

David nunan. (2015). Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages An Introduction. New york and London: routledge.

Dornyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of The Language Learner:Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Erton, I. (2010). Relationship Personality Trait Language Learning Style and Succes in Language Learning Achievement. H. U. Journal of Education). 38:115-126.

Eysenck, H. J. (1964). Manual of The Eysenck Personality Scales. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

Gay and Airasian, P. a. (2000). Educational research: Competence for analysis an application (6. New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.138

Gay, L. R. (2012). Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Applications. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.228

Gay,L.R., Geoffrey. E, Mills & peter A., (1981). Educational research, competencies for analysis & application, eight editions. Columbus Ohio: Charles E, Merril Publishing. 298

Gustriani, Y. (2020). A Comparative Study Between Extrovert And Introvert. 16-52.

gustriani, y. (2020). a comparative study between extrovert and introvert students on speaking performance at senior high schoo 4 pekan baru. UPLOAD.

Harmer, J. (2001). the practice of English Language Teaching. london: logman .

Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching. London: Logman.28

Harmer, J. (2015). the practice of English languge teacher. fifth edition.

Husnawati. (2017). Students’ Speaking Performance: Some Challenging Factors. (Unpublished Bachelor thesis.) UIN Ar-Raniry.

Louis Cohen, L. M. (2007). Research Methods in Education. New York: Routledge 270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016.421

McRorie, M. e. (2009). A Model of Personality and Emotional Traits. Zs. Ruttkay et al. (Eds). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 27 – 33.

Newman, S. B. (2009). Missing in action: Vocabulary instruction in pre-k. The Reading Teacher. 385

Nunan, D. (1991). Language Teaching Methodology: A Textbook for Teachers (9th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.

Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English Language Teaching. New York: McGrawHill.

Nunan, D. (2015). Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages: An Introduction. New York: NY: Routledge.24

Nunan, R. C. (2001). The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Language. Cambridge: University Press.

Richards, J. C. (2010). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching & Applied Linguistics. London : Pearson.

Suryabrata, S. (2012). Psikologi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: RajawaliPers, 112.

Talib, J., Asra, A. A., & Mapata, D.(2021). Bahasa Indonesia (Tata Tulis Dan Komunikasi Ilmiah). Media Sains Indonesia.

Thornbury, S. (2005). How to Teach Speaking. Epson: Longman.128-129

Thornbury, S. (2005). How to Teach Speaking. New York: Logman.

WULANDARI, D. S. (2017). EXTROVERT AND INTROVERT STUDENTS IN SPEAKING ABILITY. 22-25.

Yufebri Rahmadina, S. M. (2016/2017). A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN EXTROVERT AND INTROVERT. 6.

Zafar, S. (2011). A Study of the Relationship between Extraversion/Introversion and Risk- Taking in the Context of Second Language Acquisition. School of Social Sciences and Languages, VIT University, India. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning. , Vol. 1, No 1, pp. 33-40.

Zhang, Y. (2008). The Role of Personality in Second Language Acquisition. Asian Social Science Vol. 4, no. 5 pp. 58-59.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Isma, A. K. ., Room, F., & Syam, . N. I. . . (2022). A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN EXTROVERT AND INTROVERT PERSONALITY OF STUDENTS SPEAKING PERFORMANCE OF UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH BULUKUMBA. Jurnal Pendidikan Sang Surya, 8(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.56959/jpss.v8i1.71